So, it probably isn't too surprising that the Huthis blame the US, by way of AQAP, for the murderous funereal bombing that threatens to open up a new front of violence inside Yemen. There is a thick atmosphere of paranoia inside the country's politics. President Salih lumps together the three threats of AQAP, Huthis and the Southern Movement- this is part cynical but part a logical extension of his belief that only he can hold the country together, an apres moi, le deluge mentality. (though one would have to ask: how much worse the flood?) Everybody also blames Iran for the Huthis, despite lack of any evidence. The Huthis and AQAP see the government as a pawn of the US and Israel, a notion that is being reinforced by the Wikileaks revelations. Basically, you have the US and Iran fighting each other via al-Qaeda and the Huthis, respectively. Israel fits in somewhere, probably supporting al-Qaeda (although, as I blogged about in April, AQAP was supposedly teaming up with anti-Hamas extremists in Gaza to attack Jews in both Israel and Yemen, so this isn't a perfect marriage).
This is the kind of thinking that comes from a poisoned and poisoning politics. Despite the proliferation of NGOs, there is not an adequate public space inside of Yemen for politics to be hashed out. Qat chews are a helpful outlet, and a wonderful part of life, but with the crackdown on press it is terribly surprising that the wildest conspiracy theories are ones that gain traction. This is a mess of Salih's making.
I don't want to imply that paranoia is a strictly Yemeni or Arab phenomena. There is plenty of paranoia in American politics as well- it is deeply a part of both the far left and mainstream, Tea Party right (who are not really "conservative", by any real definition). I think it is part of human nature to see events as controlled and not left to chance and capriciousness and folly and short-sighted thinking. While paranoids tend to be freaked out a lot, there is comfort there; paranoia is a safety blanket warmly shielding one from randomness. In Yemen, where things are falling apart, and there is a history of outside interference, it is better to conjure a grand narrative than being buffeted by a series of ad hoc decisions.
In a strange way, I suppose it is almost reassuring that the Huthis blame the US for AQAP's attack. Maybe there is a strong strain of thought preventing them from thinking fellow Yemenis could do such a thing. Optimistic paranoia. Maybe a happier Pynchon could do something with that.
Relaunching Comments
10 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment